Contents
Reviews edit
Hi Georgia – you are hoped by me do not mind, but we jumped in and included the rule for hanging indent in your sources part. To incorporate more recommendations inside the formatting, simply place them in prior to the double curly brackets at the finish (). Hope your writing is certainly going well: )–MMMRH9416 (discuss • contribs) 04:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi there! We noticed you didn’t have guide chapters added under “see also” as of this time that you might find relevant to your topic so I went ahead and found you two chapters from 2014! Hope they help! –U3133258 (discuss contribs that are• 03:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC) 2.14PM 16 October 2017
Going casing edit
Topic development review and feedback. This issue development is reviewed in accordance with the marking requirements.
Written feedback is prov beginning a brand new area below and/or calling the reviewer. Topic development markings will later be available via Moodle. Keep an optical attention on notices. Remember that markings are derived from that which was available prior to the date that is due whereas the commentary can also be according to all product offered at period of supplying this feedback.
Title, sub-title, TOC edit
- Minimal at time of subject development distribution; is currently nearly correct – remove very first letter term capitalisation – simply capitalise the initial page for the title and subtitle to match aided by the book/wiki design
Consumer web web page edit
- Produced, but fundamental at period of distribution without any links
- Applied effectively
Social share edit
- None at period of subject development distribution
- 1 good website link and summary prov Section headings edit
- Eliminate bold from headings – make use of standard heading designs
- At time of distribution, not a lot of section development that is heading
- Centered on present content, it isn’t clear that the very best appropriate emotional theories and research has been Key points edit
</li>
- None of note prov Image edit
- Included
- Too little read easily – cons recommendations edit
- None prov Resources edit
Image edits edit. Hey here, Hope you mange to finish over time!
We edited a few of the image sizes and in addition included a picture to greatly help break within the block of writing. Best Of Luck! –Maddison Frost (reveal • contribs) 11:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Direct content from individual web page edit
Hey Georgia, we realised most of the long ago in the beginning of chapter development we left a touch upon your individual web page perhaps not right right right here, so here its:
Hey Georgia – After on from through the aforementioned recommendations, i discovered this informative article which can be posted in 2010, and I also believe it offers a well-rounded study of sexting in adolescents: Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Peeters, E. (2017;2016; ). Sexting: Adolescents’ perceptions regarding the applications useful for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(4), 446-470. Doi: 10.1080/13676261.2016.1241865. I am hoping this could become a foundation for the Book Chapter: ) –U3144362 (discuss contribs that are• 10:14, 20 August 2017 (UTC)U3144362 02:50 17 August 2017
–U3144362 (discuss contribs that are• 13:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC) u3144362 12:15 AM
Chapter review and feedback edit
This chapter happens to be reviewed in accordance with the marking requirements. Written feedback is prov starting a section that is new and/or calling the reviewer. Chapter markings will be accessible later on via Moodle, along side social share markings and feedback. Keep attention on notices.
Overall edit
- Overall, that is a problematic chapter they differ by gender because it doesn’t use the best available psychological science about the motivations for online dating and how. Rather the chapter covers lots of basic motivational theory and covers exactly exactly how this linked to relationship motivations between genders, not online dating inspiration.
- Overall, this will be a fantastic chapter that effectively makes use of emotional concept and research to simply help deal with a practical, real-world issue.
- Overall, this is certainly a fundamental, but chapter that is sufficient.
- For extra feedback, see these copyedits.
Theory edit
- A diverse selection of basic motivational concept is covered. It will be safer to concentrate on a smaller number of concept that is more directly linked to internet dating and sex distinctions. For instance, i www.datingmentor.org/clover-review am uncertain why Maslow’s hierarchy of requirements is included.
- The Reeve (2015) textbook is overused as a citation – rather, utilise primary, peer-reviewed sources.
Analysis edit
- Very little research about motivations for internet dating and exactly how these vary by sex is included in the chapter. This can be a major omission.
- Whenever explaining crucial research findings, suggest the dimensions of results in addition to whether or not there was clearly an impact or relationship.
- Some statements had been unreferenced – look at factual? Tags
Penned expression edit
- Penned expression
- Wording and casing for the name and subtitle ended up being modified to match the written guide design
- To enhance the chapter, include more initial writing and lower the quantity of direct quoting
- Abbreviations (such as for instance e.g., in other words. Etc. ) should simply be utilized ins grammar? Tags.
- APA design
- Utilize APA design for figure and table captions
- Prov
Multimedia feedback, The multimedia that are accompanying is marked in accordance with the marking requirements.
Markings can be found through the product’s Moodle web site. Written feedback is prov beginning a section that is new. The unit convener if you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact.