Really, what exactly is incorrect with a city that is local, that is solitary and freely homosexual, to locate intercourse inside the off hours? Do single people that are straight intercourse? I do believe they are doing. Do they sometimes own it with individuals they’ve just came across, at pubs or events? Why, yes they are doing. Therefore is the fact that brand brand new standard – in the event that you even vaguely intimate that you’re enthusiastic about resting with another person, it is news! Because right dudes, if they head to pubs, they never search getting set. Oh no. It’s only for an agreeable drink that is platonic buddies. No intercourse, please, we’re directly.
You can find a few things going on in this tale. First, homophobia. Exactly just exactly How salacious that the homosexual guy ended up being wanting to get set (oh my!). 2nd, Internet-phobia. How salacious that somebody used the online world to attempt to meet another individual. Kate McGinty couldn’t have cared less had an unmarried heterosexual town councilman ended up being utilizing eHarmony to satisfy ladies (and then he suggested in the profile which he really may indeed give consideration to sleeping with those ladies!)…
It is abominable that it was thought by this newspaper highly relevant to reveal this.
– John Aravosis taking the Desert Sun to task for writing a non-story about Desert Hot Springs town council user Karl Baker utilizing a photograph of himself in council on their Adam4Adam account. Must’ve been a news day that is reeeeeeaaaalllly slow.
Get Queerty Daily
11 Responses
Minimal Kiwi
It is a much more example that is extreme of Anthony Weiner-style nonsense.
Exactly why is this a problem? How come individuals care? What exactly is UP with People in america having priorities within the incorrect destination?
have a look online – you’ll find a lot of photographs of elected officials glorifying the usage of firearms. this even though 30,000 Americans are killed EACH SEASON by weapon physical violence.
where’s the uproar over that? individuals are too busy being aggravated concerning the intercourse other folks are experiencing.
your brain boggles.
No. 1 · minimal Kiwi penned, “This is a far more example that is extreme of Anthony Weiner-style nonsense.”
Oh, it is even worse than that. Consider the image of him – if that’s the only he utilized, he clearly had not been hunting for intercourse at Adam4Adam.com but had been rather in search of individuals thinking about a slumber celebration where they actually sleep!
The image obviously shows him dozing off (hardly a shock for it. while he ended up being probably paying attention to some constituent drone on about representing the Veterans of Foreign Women, which as 30 regular users, 15 connect people, 23 honorary users, and 3 interns who do the true work but don’t receives a commission)
Tommy
Just exactly How stupid of him to possess their face pic open.He should experienced it locked.He can also be looking that is really nasty bet he didn’t get many times.He must certanly be fired we don’t want my town councilman on adam 4 adam.
@Tommy: No, I’m sure you would prefer to them take part in surreptitious nepotism or cronyism…get a life.
Pocket Otter
Judging from that photo, I’m sort of guessing Mr. Baker doesn’t get a great deal of reactions in the inbox. Or their outbox. Or mailbox, toolbox, cereal box—let’s face it, the guy might have already been a target of yellowish journalism, but purdy how much does ourtime com cost he ain’t.
James
This really is a concern he used) because he used his city council picture (read the article to see the picture. I would find that more problematic if he had a personal picture and this article was still printed.
And btw, what’s with all the comments that are shallow? Their look has nothing in connection with the presssing issue in front of you.
ousslander
I don’t believe it is homophobic. He put their personal life down on display, so he can’t be angry that someone penned about any of it.
Thomas Maguire
Because when did A wilford that is bewigged brimley away as a homo?
JoeyB
He’s gross, like the majority of dudes on Adam4Adam.
Jon Tom
It’s nothing but an ole witch hunt that is fashioned! Whom cares exactly exactly just what he appears like!
Manny Espinola
“This is a concern because he utilized their town council image.”
Really? Meaning the picture is federal federal government property? Like in taken with federal government digital digital camera and/or uploaded for a national federal government workplace computer?