Article share options
Share this on
Forward this by
- Messenger
- Copy website website link
A Hobart court has heard there is nothing sinister or untoward within the actions of a convicted rapist and killer as he joined up with numerous online dating sites, and utilized an alias on Facebook.
Tips:
- Curtis served 32 years in prison for rape, torture and murder and it is a subscribed sex offender
- The 64-year-old finalized as much as sites that are dating utilized an alias for Facebook while on parole
- Curtis had been sentenced to three months’ prison for breaching his community security purchase by maybe perhaps perhaps not reporting their internet activity to authorities
Jamie John Curtis ended up being paroled in June year that is last serving 32 years for the repeated rape and torture of a 19-year-old girl together with murder of her fiance in 1986.
Curtis is really a sex that is registered and it is from the Community Protection Register for life.
Among the list of conditions imposed on individuals regarding the register is they need to report any phones that are mobile internet reports, account names and passwords to police.
The Magistrates Court heard within months of their launch, Curtis had joined three internet dating sites — an abundance of Fish, slutty Date and Zeus — and had a Facebook account employing a fake title.
He used the Facebook messenger solution to send two messages to a female he previously started dating after meeting her online.
The 64-year-old pleaded accountable when you look at the Magistrates Court in Hobart to breaching the Community Protection Order and a restraining purchase.
Curtis has been doing custody since police searched their vehicle and house in October year that is last seizing their cellular phone.
He had been also faced with fraudulence offences but those charges were dismissed, after prosecutors tendered no evidence today.
Curtis ‘not especially able aided by the internet’
Defence attorney Fabiano Cangelosi stated Curtis had “a belated 1980s knowledge of technology” and “a naive notion of you skill with a cellular phone”.
“He came to be in 1955, jailed in 1986 and paroled year that is last” Mr Cangelosi stated.
“caused by that has been that in 1986 as he visited prison, he knew of computers but he did not get one … he previously extremely use that is limited of computer in jail.
“Emerging from prison he had been basically an individual placing a base in to the century that is 21st an awareness of technology from the 1980s. “
Mr Cangelosi stated that while Curtis had finalized to express he comprehended the conditions regarding the Community Protection Order and carried a duplicate from it with him on their phone, he didn’t obviously have a practical knowledge of exactly what the net ended up being.
“He is certainly not specially able with all the internet, ” Mr Cangelosi stated.
He stated his customer “thought that the net had been a fixed thing” that needed an even more active procedure to activate with and ended up being “naive” by what their cellular phone could do.
Mr Cangelosi stated the alias Curtis utilized on Facebook wasn’t intended to avoid authorities detection, but instead because he had been conscious that he is the target of unwelcome attention as a result of their past crimes.
There is “nothing by itself untoward as to what Curtis had been doing on the web sites that are dating, his attorney stated.
Offences ‘not that serious’: magistrate
In sentencing, Magistrate Michael Daley stated the breach had been accepted by him ended up being in component because Curtis have been in prison since 1986 and failed to completely understand the world wide web.
“we additionally accept Mr Curtis had not been doing any such thing dubious by having an alias on Twitter … I think most would accept that, including me that is additionally on Facebook, ” he stated.
“To commit these offences while on parole is severe which is certainly an aggravating element. “
https://datingperfect.net/dating-sites/spdate-reviews-comparison
Not surprisingly, he stated the offences had been “not that serious”, but that further offending would probably to see their face more imprisonment that is substantial.
Mr Daley sentenced Curtis to a three-month prison sentence — backdated by half a year to take into consideration the full time he had invested in prison considering that the breaches.
Curtis’ parole for their life phrase ended up being revoked during their amount of time in custody in which he shall have to re-apply into the Parole Board to be re-released from jail