Showing the newest
CFPB v. Cash Advance Debt Solution
In December 2012, the CFPB, aided by the states of Hawaii, New Mexico, new york, North Dakota and Wisconsin, sued the Payday Loan Debt Solution organization for “violating state and federal debt settlement legislation” by not supplying debt settlement solutions to customers whom paid costs. Payday Loan Debt Solution had been bought to refund $100,000 to clients…
CFPB v. National Legal Help Center; CFPB v. potential Edward Gordon d/b/a Gordon & Associates , Abraham Michael Pessar et al.
In 2012, the CFPB sued the nationwide Legal Help Center and potential Gordon along with his law practice, Gordon & Associates, for “loan modification frauds” that allegedly charged home owners to lessen their mortgage repayments with “little, if any, significant support to change home owners’ home mortgages or counter property property foreclosure,” that will be a “violation of federal legislation.”
CFPB – Discover Bank
In September 2012, the CFPB and FDIC issued a permission order to uncover Bank for misleading and pressuring clients into buying products that are add-on. Discover ended up being bought to refund $200 million to more or less 3.5 million clients for presumably customers that are enrolling programs “without their permission, misled them in regards to the advantages and left clients thinking the merchandise.
CFPB v. Meracord LLC, Linda Remsberg
A payment processing company, for assisting “debt-relief companies enforce unlawful upfront costs. in titlemax website October 2013, the CFPB sued Meracord” Federal legislation forbids debt-relief organizations from getting re payments before settling any debts, nevertheless the CFPB unearthed that Meracord presumably “processed at the very least $11 million in illegal costs” from “more than 11,000 customers around the world.”
CFPB – JPMorgan Chase Bank and Chase Bank United States Of America
In September 2013, the CFPB, in coordination with all the workplace regarding the Comptroller associated with the Currency (OCC), granted a consent order to JPMorgan Chase for “deceiving an incredible number of clients into purchasing expensive and unneeded solutions whenever they enrolled in bank cards.” JPMorgan Chase ended up being purchased to refund $309 million to around 2.1 million clients.
CFPB v. Morgan Drexen, Inc. and Walter Ledda
In August 2013, the CFPB sued Morgan Drexen as well as its president, Walter Ledda, for presumably asking upfront “illegal charges” to “more than 22,000 clients” to “help them resolve outstanding debts” as well as presumably utilizing “false and deceptive marketing.” Morgan Drexen presumably deceived customers into “signing up for expensive services that are bankruptcy-related telling them they might.
CFPB v. Castle & Cooke Mortgage, LLC., Matthew A. Pineda, and Buck L. Hawkins
In July 2013, the CFPB sued Castle & Cooke Mortgage, LLC., and its own top professionals, Matthew Pineda and Buck Hawkins, for “paying unlawful bonuses to workers whom steered house purchasers toward higher-interest loans.” Castle & Cooke Mortgage allegedly went a “quarterly bonus system that paid $6,100 to $8,700 to loan officers whom persuaded customers.
CFPB – U.S. Bank Nationwide Association; CFPB – Dealers’ Monetary Services, LLC
In June 2013, the CFPB issued a permission order to U.S. Bank nationwide Association and Dealers’ Financial Services for misleading “military solution users whom took part in a car financing system.” The CFPB alleged that both organizations “failed to isclose costs associated properly with repaying automobile financing’ designed to service users.” U.S Bank decided to repay.
CFPB – U.S. Bank Nationwide Association; CFPB – Dealers’ Monetary Services, LLC
In June 2013, the CFPB issued a permission order to U.S. Bank nationwide Association and Dealers’ Financial Services for misleading service that is”military whom took part in an automobile financing system.” The CFPB alleged that both organizations “failed to precisely reveal expenses linked with repaying auto loans’ meant to service users.” U.S Bank decided to repay.
CFPB – Ally Financial
In 2013, the CFPB, combined with the Department of Justice, settled claims against Ally Financial for breaking “fair credit regulations by recharging minority borrowers greater markups on automobile financing than white clients.” Ally consented to spend $98 million in restitution, with $80 million likely to customers in damages and another $18 million being a civil.